Foshan Ceramics EU Customs IP Detention — Customs Recordation and Cross-Border Enforcement

Court: Huangpu Customs and Guangzhou IP Court (2024)

Facts: A Foshan ceramics company (Company I) owned the "XX Ceramics" registered trademark and several tile design patents, mainly exporting to the EU, and had completed IP recordation with the General Administration of Customs. In March 2024, a shipment of tiles bound for Germany was detained by German customs on suspicion of infringing an Italian company's (Company J's) design patent, and J filed suit in the EU courts. Company I urgently applied to Huangpu Customs for IP protection and filed a declaratory non-infringement action in Guangzhou IP Court.

Holding:

(1) Huangpu Customs assisted in verifying infringement clues and confirmed clear differences between I's products and J's patent, constituting no infringement;

(2) Guangzhou IP Court issued a declaratory non-infringement judgment, which Company I used to apply to German customs for release;

(3) With EU lawyers assisting the defense, Company J ultimately withdrew the suit and the goods were cleared.

法槌、放大镜与合同文本(合同审查)

Significance:

· Builds a full-chain enforcement system combining domestic customs recordation, cross-border judicial confirmation, and overseas lawyer coordination, providing a model for Guangdong exporters facing overseas IP detentions;

· Highlights the importance of customs IP protection and encourages exporters to complete IP filings and customs recordation in advance;

· Demonstrates the effectiveness of coordinated IP protection by Guangdong courts and customs, helping exporters address technical trade barriers.

Related Articles

Foshan Ceramics EU Customs Detention — Maritime Injunction and Cross-Border IP Coordination

Court: Guangzhou Maritime Court (2024) Facts: A Foshan ceramics company (petitioner) owned the "XX Ceramics" registered trademark, but its EU-bound goods were detained by German customs on suspicion of infringing an Italian company's design patent. The petitioner urgently applied to the Guangzhou Maritime Court for a maritime injunction ordering the carrier to suspend delivery and […]

Read

Zhaoqing Chemical v. Hong Kong Forwarder — Choice of Law in Hong Kong-Related Forwarding

Court: Guangzhou Maritime Court (2024) Facts: A Zhaoqing chemical enterprise (plaintiff) engaged a Hong Kong forwarder (defendant) for imported chemical raw materials, with no written contract beyond WeChat communications. Upon arrival at Huangpu Port, some raw materials were moisture-damaged, causing 600,000 RMB in losses. The plaintiff sued for compensation; the defendant argued Hong Kong law […]

Read